User Tools

Site Tools


cluster:112

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
cluster:112 [2013/04/12 19:07]
hmeij [Replace Dell]
cluster:112 [2013/05/09 12:42]
hmeij [Dell April-2013]
Line 19: Line 19:
 |  Cooling (Btus((per hour, 1,000 Btus=293 Watts per hour)))|  |  ((2009 Wesleyan estimate))39,240|  ((vendor published))36,175|  ((vendor published))20,171|  ((vendor published))17,913|  | |  Cooling (Btus((per hour, 1,000 Btus=293 Watts per hour)))|  |  ((2009 Wesleyan estimate))39,240|  ((vendor published))36,175|  ((vendor published))20,171|  ((vendor published))17,913|  |
 |  Annual Costs((power and cooling)) ($)|  |  46,091|  42,930|  25,864|  23,506|  ((for Wesleyan/vendors data))using 2009 data| |  Annual Costs((power and cooling)) ($)|  |  46,091|  42,930|  25,864|  23,506|  ((for Wesleyan/vendors data))using 2009 data|
 +|  $1,000/Tflop|  |  69.8|  28.6|  1.3|  6.5|  ((for Wesleyan/vendors data))using 2009 data|
  
  
Line 60: Line 61:
   * "roughly" $2,310 per 2U-shelves (18 2U-shelves + 2 head nodes of 2U)   * "roughly" $2,310 per 2U-shelves (18 2U-shelves + 2 head nodes of 2U)
  
-===== Dell Jan-2013 ===== 
  
-** Actual data obtained 11 April - 18 April, 2013 ** 
- 
-Watt-o-Meter Stats mean/1000 * 24 * 365 * 30! 
  
-^  Node^  threads^  kwh^  time hh:mm^  mean^  comment^  annual kwh^ power annual^ +cooling annual x2^ 
-|  c04|  8|  0.49|  01:24|  333|  idle, no jobs|   87,512|  $20,357|  $40,714| 
-|  c32|  8|  6.94|  19:35|  356|  jobs finished|   93,556|  $21,610|  $43,220| 
-|  c27|  8|  7.42|  19:30|  381|  jobs finished|  100,127|  $22,971|  $45,942| 
-|  c10|  8| 10.21|  23.55|  425|  still running|  111,690|  $25,367|  $50,734| 
  
  
Line 98: Line 90:
 ** This is what the picture would look like using the 2009 spreadsheet data** ** This is what the picture would look like using the 2009 spreadsheet data**
  
-  * 240 cores, make them all ethernet based  +What we should look at is teraflops replacement ...
-    * slight change but doable +
-  * 1U yields 16 cores, 15U yields 240 cores with a total of 1,920 GB memory +
-    * major change, Dell offers 388 GB +
-  * acquisition costs +
-    * 15 x $5,782 = $86,730 + PDUs, ethernet switch, cables +
-    * power/AC costs: $23,506/year x3 years = $70,518 +
-  * add both costs of new hardware and divide by dell total annual costs power+cooling +
-    * ROI: 3.4 years - but this is on a core by core basis +
- +
-What we should look at is teraflops...+
  
-  * 0.66 teraflops, measured with Linpack +  * 0.66 teraflops, measured with Linpack (actual) 
-  * E5-2660 is rated at 140 Gflops so one node provides 280 Gflops (theoretically)+  * E5-2660 is rated at 140 Gflops so one node provides 280 Gflops (theoretical)
   * 2 and 1/3rd 1U nodes then replace the cluster   * 2 and 1/3rd 1U nodes then replace the cluster
   * acquisition costs   * acquisition costs
Line 120: Line 102:
     * ROI: 3/4 year - but this is on a teraflop by teraflop basis     * ROI: 3/4 year - but this is on a teraflop by teraflop basis
  
-And if we double the teraflops...1.6 Tflops (actually +1Tflops), 1.5 years ROI for 96 cores.+And if we double the teraflops...1.6 Tflops (actually + 1 Tflops), 1.5 years ROI for 96 cores.
  
  
Line 136: Line 118:
     * LCBR 06     * LCBR 06
     * (#3 on Enterprise UPS) PDI1 CIR 31,33     * (#3 on Enterprise UPS) PDI1 CIR 31,33
 +
 +
 +====== Dell April-2013 ======
 +
 +** Actual data obtained 11 April - 18 April, 2013 **
 +
 +Kill-A-Watt Meter Stats; pulled one power supply ... mean/1000 * 24 * 365 * 30! 
 +
 +^  Node^  jobs^  kwh^  time hh:mm^  mean^  comment^  annual kwh^ power annual^ +cooling annual (x2)^^
 +|  c04|  8|  2.29|  06:30|  352|  idle, no jobs|   92,509|  $21,393|  $42,786|  wow|
 +|  c32|  8|  6.94|  19:35|  356|  jobs finished|   93,556|  $21,610|  $43,220|  |
 +|  c27|  8|  7.42|  19:30|  381|  jobs finished|  100,127|  $22,971|  $45,942|  |
 +|  c06|  8| 27.46|  65:11|  395|      4 running|  103,806|  $23,734|  $47,468|  |
 +|  c00|  8|  8.26|  21:00|  393|  still running|  103,280|  $23,625|  $47,250| *|
 +|  c03|  8| 10.36|  24:03|  432|  still running|  113,530|  $25,748|  $51,496| *|
 +|  c04|  8| 12.02|  28:08|  429|  still running|  112,741|  $25,585|  $51,170| *|
 +|  c09|  8| 10.36|  24:00|  432|  still running|  113,530|  $25,748|  $51,496| *|
 +|  c10|  8| 10.21|  23.55|  425|  still running|  111,690|  $25,367|  $50,734| * mean|
 +|  c20|  8| 50.23|    143|  351|  still running|  |  |  | *|
 +|  c23|  8|  8.71|  24.00|  363|  still running|  |  |  | *|
 +|  c25|  8|  9.80|  25.02|  392|  still running|  |  |  | *|
 +|  c29|  8| 30.22|  66:22|  455|  still running|  119,574|  $27,001|  $54,002| *|
 +|  c31|  8| 10.30|  25:10|  409|  still running|  107,485|  $24,496|  $48,992| *|
 +|  c32|  8| 11.42|  24:00|  476|  still running|  123,379|  $27,789|  $55,578| *|
 +|  c33|  8| 46.23|    113|  409|  still running|  |  |  | *|
 +|  c35|  8| 13.69|  28:53|  474|  still running|  |  |  | *|
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +====== HP April-2013 ======
 +
 +^  Node^  threads^  kwh^  time hh:mm^  mean^  comment^  annual kwh^ power annual^ +cooling annual (x2)^^
 +
 +** Actual data obtained 11 April - 18 April, 2013 **
  
 \\ \\
 **[[cluster:0|Back]]** **[[cluster:0|Back]]**
cluster/112.txt · Last modified: 2013/10/08 19:04 by hmeij