User Tools

Site Tools


cluster:123

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
cluster:123 [2013/10/10 15:15]
hmeij
cluster:123 [2013/10/10 15:21]
hmeij
Line 30: Line 30:
 The total cost of running the new hardware would be $5,913. That would imply a savings rate of $21,576 per year. The job slot count would be 112 but with hyperthreading technology that can be doubled. We'd still want the 1,792 memory footprint (8 gb/core) and the gigaflops still far exceeds Dell's performance. The total cost of running the new hardware would be $5,913. That would imply a savings rate of $21,576 per year. The job slot count would be 112 but with hyperthreading technology that can be doubled. We'd still want the 1,792 memory footprint (8 gb/core) and the gigaflops still far exceeds Dell's performance.
  
-Within two years, the new hardware ($41K) will have paid for itself based on the low water mark (Dell's cost would equal $55K). We still need to adjust some minor issues: +Within two years, the new hardware (about $41K) will have paid for itself based on the low water mark (Dell's cost would equal $55K). We still need to adjust some minor issues:
-- there is enough Infiniband ports available to put all new nodes on such a switch +
-- the internal disks need to be of higher speed (10K) or better of size 300 GB or larger (mimicking the Dell disk arrays) +
-- perhaps go to 9 nodes total+
  
 +  * there is enough Infiniband ports available to put all new nodes on such a switch (add cards and cables cost)
 +  * the internal disks need to be of higher speed (10K or better) of a larger size (300 GB or larger) mimicking the Dell disk arrays (add costs)
  
- +But it is all very doable within budget of $45-$55K 
  
 The end. The end.
cluster/123.txt · Last modified: 2013/10/23 18:52 by hmeij