This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
cluster:123 [2013/10/10 15:15] hmeij |
cluster:123 [2013/10/10 15:21] hmeij |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
The total cost of running the new hardware would be $5,913. That would imply a savings rate of $21,576 per year. The job slot count would be 112 but with hyperthreading technology that can be doubled. We'd still want the 1,792 memory footprint (8 gb/core) and the gigaflops still far exceeds Dell's performance. | The total cost of running the new hardware would be $5,913. That would imply a savings rate of $21,576 per year. The job slot count would be 112 but with hyperthreading technology that can be doubled. We'd still want the 1,792 memory footprint (8 gb/core) and the gigaflops still far exceeds Dell's performance. | ||
- | Within two years, the new hardware ($41K) will have paid for itself based on the low water mark (Dell' | + | Within two years, the new hardware (about $41K) will have paid for itself based on the low water mark (Dell' |
- | - there is enough Infiniband ports available to put all new nodes on such a switch | + | |
- | - the internal disks need to be of higher speed (10K) or better of size 300 GB or larger (mimicking the Dell disk arrays) | + | |
- | - perhaps go to 9 nodes total | + | |
+ | * there is enough Infiniband ports available to put all new nodes on such a switch (add cards and cables cost) | ||
+ | * the internal disks need to be of higher speed (10K or better) of a larger size (300 GB or larger) mimicking the Dell disk arrays (add costs) | ||
- | + | But it is all very doable within budget of $45-$55K | |
The end. | The end. |