cluster:151
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
cluster:151 [2016/11/29 16:20] hmeij07 [Resync Data #2] |
cluster:151 [2016/11/29 19:09] hmeij07 [beeGFS] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| A document for me to recall and make notes of what I read in the manual pages and what needs testing. | A document for me to recall and make notes of what I read in the manual pages and what needs testing. | ||
| - | Basically during the Summer of 2016 I investigated if the HPCC could afford enterprise level storage. I wanted 99.999% uptime, snapshots, high availability and other goodies such as parallel NFS. Netapp came the closest but, eh, still at $42K lots of other options show up. The story is detailed | + | Basically during the Summer of 2016 I investigated if the HPCC could afford enterprise level storage. I wanted 99.999% uptime, snapshots, high availability and other goodies such as parallel NFS. Netapp came the closest but, eh, still at $42K lots of other options show up. That story is detailed at [[cluster: |
| This page is best read from the bottom up. | This page is best read from the bottom up. | ||
| Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
| | | ||
| | | ||
| + | |||
| + | # first rsync drops roughly 5G in both primaries which then get copied to secondaries. | ||
| + | # second rsync does the same so both storage servers loose 20G roughly | ||
| + | # now shut a storage server down and the whole filesystem can still be accessed (HA) | ||
| </ | </ | ||
cluster/151.txt ยท Last modified: 2016/12/06 20:14 by hmeij07
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
