This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
cluster:184 [2019/09/03 12:55] hmeij07 [Summary] |
cluster:184 [2019/09/05 11:56] hmeij07 [2019 GPU Expansion] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* [[cluster: | * [[cluster: | ||
* [[cluster: | * [[cluster: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Vendor | ||
+ | ^ Quote ^ #1 ^ #2 ^ #1 ^ #2 ^ #1 ^ #2 ^ #1 ^ #2 ^ | | ||
+ | | Nodes | | | | | | | | | U | | ||
+ | | Cpus | | | | | | | | | | | ||
+ | | Cores | | | | | | | | | physical | ||
+ | | Gpus | | | | | | | | | | | ||
+ | | Cores | | | | | | | | | cuda | | ||
+ | | Cores | | | | | | | | | tensor | ||
+ | | Tflops | ||
+ | | Tflops | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Exxactcorp**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Microway**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **ConRes**: In regards to the question around active vs. passive cooling on GPUs, the T4, V100, and other passively cooled GPUs are intended for 100% utilization and actually can offer better cooling and higher density in a system than active GPU models. | ||