cluster:93
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
cluster:93 [2011/01/07 20:49] hmeij |
cluster:93 [2011/01/07 20:52] hmeij |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| * A single queue is preferred. | * A single queue is preferred. | ||
| * Data (NFS) was to be served up via a secondary gigabit ethernet switch, hence not compete with administrative traffic. | * Data (NFS) was to be served up via a secondary gigabit ethernet switch, hence not compete with administrative traffic. | ||
| - | * (With the HP solution we will actually route data (NFS) traffic over the infiniband switch, a practice called IPoIB) | + | * (With the HP solution we will actually route data (NFS) traffic over the infiniband switch |
| * Linux or CentOS as operating system. | * Linux or CentOS as operating system. | ||
| * Flexible on scheduler (options: Lava, LSF, Sun Grid Engine) | * Flexible on scheduler (options: Lava, LSF, Sun Grid Engine) | ||
cluster/93.txt ยท Last modified: 2011/01/11 20:55 by hmeij
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
