User Tools

Site Tools


cluster:153

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
cluster:153 [2017/03/01 14:55]
hmeij07
cluster:153 [2017/12/06 10:34] (current)
hmeij07
Line 1: Line 1:
 \\ \\
 **[[cluster:0|Back]]** **[[cluster:0|Back]]**
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +https://nsf.gov/pubs/2018/nsf18508/nsf18508.htm
 +
 +Due Jan 30, 2018, totally refocused on network, killing the ideas on this page
 + --- //[[hmeij@wesleyan.edu|Henk]] 2017/12/06 08:50//
  
 ==== NSF CC* ==== ==== NSF CC* ====
  
-  * Create a $1M+ CC* proposal to meet the research, staff and cyberinfrastructure+  * Create a $1 Million+ CC* proposal to meet the research, staff and cyberinfrastructure
   * Needs/Wants of small, primarily undergraduate, northeast Higher Ed institutions   * Needs/Wants of small, primarily undergraduate, northeast Higher Ed institutions
   * To share faculty expertise (current research projects and new collaborations)   * To share faculty expertise (current research projects and new collaborations)
Line 11: Line 19:
   * Establish a single, participants' wide, user directory with global access   * Establish a single, participants' wide, user directory with global access
   * Provide for multiple off-site, geographically dispersed, backup storage targets   * Provide for multiple off-site, geographically dispersed, backup storage targets
-  * Establish a global Data Management Plan for all institutions' participants+  * Establish a global Data Management Plan for all institutions participation
  
  
Line 17: Line 25:
  
   * Data Driven Multi-Campus/Multi-Institution Model, or/and Cyber Team    * Data Driven Multi-Campus/Multi-Institution Model, or/and Cyber Team 
-  * RFP mid March?+  * <del>RFP mid March?</del> More like May/June (found 2016 announcement via AdvancedClustering of 06/02/2016)
  
   * RFI CC* (due April 5th, 2017) at https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2017/nsf17031/nsf17031.jsp   * RFI CC* (due April 5th, 2017) at https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2017/nsf17031/nsf17031.jsp
Line 25: Line 33:
  
   * RFP CC* at https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2016/nsf16567/nsf16567.htm   * RFP CC* at https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2016/nsf16567/nsf16567.htm
-  * Need to find an example of somewhat larger colleges' successful proposal in 2016+  * Henk to find an example of somewhat larger colleges' successful proposal in 2016 
 +    * these are all very large, we should also investigate XSEDE and NSF/Jetstream (cloud based) 
 +    * https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1541215&HistoricalAwards=false 
 +    * https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1640834&HistoricalAwards=false 
 +    * https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1006576&HistoricalAwards=false 
 +  * Probably more aligned with our goals, click on PDF 
 +    * http://fasterdata.es.net/campusCIplanning/university-of-new-hampshire-cyberinfrastructure-plan-2/ 
 +  * Regional Access a report to NSF, good read 
 +    * https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RBtxud9RbBemdYcGpnOExPUmM/view 
 +    * key part: the local aspect is important (flexibility and personalized attention) to ensure researcher success and productivity...collaborating at the campus and regional levels is an important aspect in building the services 
 +  * XSEDE https://www.xsede.org/using-xsede 
 +    * for research this involves writing XSEDE proposals to get time allocations, quarterly awarded 
 +  * Jeststream (allocates XSEDE resources) https://jetstream-cloud.org/ 
 +    * this also requires writing proposals for time allocations, half year cycles, not sure (?)
  
 === Thoughts === === Thoughts ===
  
-Until we **have** a 2017 CC* RFP this is a list of random thoughts to keep track of.+**Until we have a 2017 CC* RFP announcements** this is a list of random thoughts to keep track of.
  
 +  * 2016 Parsing of proposal language (Science-driven requirements are the primary motivation for any proposed activity.)
 +    * Data Driven Multi-Campus/Multi-Institution Model Implementations,1-2 awards,$3M,4 years
 +      * NSF strongly urges the community to think broadly and not simply rely on traditional models when considering multi-campus and/or multi-institutional cyberinfrastructure
 +      * Proposals are expected to be science-driven
 +      *  Proposals...significant impact on the multi-campus, multi-institutional ... through direct engagements...how adoption and usage will be measured and monitored
 +      * methods for assured federated access
 +      * Multi-institution/regional caliber data preservation and access lifecycles
 +      * across a range of disciplines, including participating institutions’ information technology (IT)
 +    * Cyber Team,2-4 awards,$1.5M,3 years
 +      * This program area seeks to build centers of expertise and knowledge in cyberinfrastructure
 +      * Proposals in this area should describe the multi-institutional science-driven needs 
 +      * Proposals ... engagement, interactions, and partnerships with science and engineering research as well as education and training activities.
 +      * Proposals ...areas of expertise, such as networking, distributed data management, and scientific computing. 
 +      * Proposals may request up to four full-time equivalents (FTE) for up to three years (inside of $1.5M???)
 +      * Proposals should describe plans for broadening participation, including how under-resourced institutions can be meaningfully engaged.
   * Leverage a common HPC environment among small, northeast, colleges   * Leverage a common HPC environment among small, northeast, colleges
     * we do science too (compare to larger colleges)     * we do science too (compare to larger colleges)
 +    * need to drive proposal with unique science efforts by each college <--- important!
 +    * think about how to build the data driven multi campus effort
   * 1-3 sysadmin FTEs covering 3-6 colleges for 3 years   * 1-3 sysadmin FTEs covering 3-6 colleges for 3 years
     * redundancy in sysadmin coverage, round robin     * redundancy in sysadmin coverage, round robin
     * each member to assess how to provide funding past year 3     * each member to assess how to provide funding past year 3
-  * Possible Members (* indicates interested member):  +  * Possible Members (underlined=informally contacted, bolded=interested party):  
-    * Hamilton, Lafayette (*), Middlebury, Trinity, Wellesley, Wesleyan (*), Williams+    * Hamilton, 
 +    * **Lafayette**engineering college HPC 
 +    * **Middlebury**
 +    * **Swarthmore**,
 +    * Trinity, image analysis 
 +    * __Wellesley__
 +    * **Wesleyan**Gaussian HPC, text mining HPC 
 +    * **Williams**, Islandora DMP
   * Each member will do an internal survey of local computing and storage desires, put together 1-2 racks   * Each member will do an internal survey of local computing and storage desires, put together 1-2 racks
-    * gpu, cpu, hybrid of such, visualization, deep learning, etc...(no UPS, compute nodes) +    * gpu, cpu, hybrid of such, visualization, deep learning,etc...(no UPS, compute nodes) 
-    * infiniband enabled /home storage with ipoib, head node (on UPS), sandbox, +    * infiniband enabled /home storage with ipoib, head node (both on UPS), sandbox 
-    * ethernet backups storage with snapshots (LVM or rsnapshot.org) (on UPS, switches)+    * ethernet storage for backup with snapshots (LVM or rsnapshot.org) (on UPS, switches)
     * possible off site backup of data, round robin, among members     * possible off site backup of data, round robin, among members
   * Hardware desires/configs to be vetted for too much redundancy    * Hardware desires/configs to be vetted for too much redundancy 
Line 48: Line 93:
     * Custom hardware requests highlight each member's area of expertise     * Custom hardware requests highlight each member's area of expertise
   * Leverage a common HPC deployment software stack   * Leverage a common HPC deployment software stack
-    * OpenHPC (openhpc.community) with shared deployment modules +    * OpenHPC (openhpc.community) with shared deployment modules (CentOS 7.x/Warewulf/Slurm) 
-    * Software modules to deploy per members' requirements +    * Application software modules to deploy per members' requirements 
-    * Shared skill set+    * Commercial software? (License type would need to be discussed with vendors) 
 +    * Shared skill set with experts in certain specific areas and tools 
 +    * Facilitate classroom usage (local temp accounts recycled by semester?)
   * User account creation   * User account creation
     * Participants can request accounts on each members' installation     * Participants can request accounts on each members' installation
-    * Local accounts with request workflow or InCommon?+    * Local accounts with request workflow, SSH keys federation <del>InCommon</del> or ...? 
 +    * Collaborative non-member account requests?
   * Meetings, ofcourse   * Meetings, ofcourse
-    * of sysadmins +    * of sysadmin group 
-    * of researchers +    * of advisory group 
-  * Data Management Plan +  * Data Management Plan (DMP) 
-    * To satisfy NSF public data access policy +    * To satisfy NSF public data access policy and distribution 
-    * One site for all (Islandora, Dspaceetc) +    * One site for all (Islandora, Dataverseor ???)One members' expertise?
-    * One members' expertise?+
   * ...   * ...
  
cluster/153.1488398151.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/03/01 14:55 (external edit)