cluster:132
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| cluster:132 [2014/08/08 19:27] – [Tests] hmeij | cluster:132 [2014/08/11 14:08] (current) – [Tests] hmeij | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
| - | 16 VMs running in queue '' | + | 16 VMs running in queue '' |
| * First ran on n35 (32 core node under hyperthreading will full load) with an average loop time 726 secs. | * First ran on n35 (32 core node under hyperthreading will full load) with an average loop time 726 secs. | ||
| Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
| But we learned Xen and KVM setups, and | But we learned Xen and KVM setups, and | ||
| - | - We can now support a heterogeous | + | - We can now support a heterogeneous |
| - | - Using a KVM environment up to the number of cores on a box | + | - Use a KVM environment up to the number of cores on a box without penalty |
| - And change the mix of nodes if needed (more/less cores per node, memory size etc) | - And change the mix of nodes if needed (more/less cores per node, memory size etc) | ||
| - Still, not an answer for my "high core count/low memory footprint" | - Still, not an answer for my "high core count/low memory footprint" | ||
cluster/132.1407526074.txt.gz · Last modified: by hmeij