Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
Next revision
|
Previous revision
|
cluster:167 [2018/08/01 12:41] hmeij07 [Jul 2018] |
cluster:167 [2018/08/01 14:11] (current) hmeij07 [July 2018] |
| Job Count | 12,798 | 18:1 | 722 | processed jobs irregardless of exit status | | | Job Count | 12,798 | 18:1 | 722 | processed jobs irregardless of exit status | |
| Avail Hours | 898,752 | 50:1 | 17,856 | total cpu cores, total gpus | | | Avail Hours | 898,752 | 50:1 | 17,856 | total cpu cores, total gpus | |
| Job Hours | 260,997 | 69:1 | 3,805 | cumulative hours of consumed usage | | | Job Hours | 322,207 | 1732:1 | 186 | cumulative hours of consumed usage | |
| Job Hours % | 30 | 1:1 | 26 | as a percentage of available | | | Job Hours % | 36 | 36:1 | 1 | as a percentage of available | |
| Avail Hours2 | 696,384 | 47:1 | 14,880 | total for cpu cores minus hp12's 256 cores, total for gpus | | |
| Job Hours2 % | 37 | 1.5:1 | 26 | more realistic...hp12 rarely used | | |
| |
Based on the utilization string '0000', meaning all gpus are idle as polled every 15 mins during July 2018, the GTX gpus were 65% completely idle and the K20s were 61% completely idle. | |
| Based on the utilization string '0000', meaning all gpus are idle on a single node as polled every 10 mins during July 2018, the GTX gpus were 65% completely idle and the K20s were 61% completely idle. |
| |
**[[cluster:0|Back]]** | **[[cluster:0|Back]]** |