All campus utilities are within the physical plant chart of accounts. Departments are not charged.
Cluster | Blue Sky | Dell | HP | GPU1) | CPU2) | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12/2006 | 11/2010 | 04/2013 | 04/2013 | |||
Age (yrs) | 11 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | |
Nodes (Nr) | 45 | 36 | 32 | 4 | 13 | |
Cores (Nr) | 90 | 256 | 256 | 3)16 gpu, 64 cpu | 208 | |
Ram (GB) | 1,080 | 384 | 340 | 80 gpu, 512 cpu | 1,664 | |
Teraflops | 4)0.5-0.7 | 5)0.66 | 6)1.5 | 7)18.71 + 8)1.1 | 9)3.6 | |
L6-30 (Nr) | 4 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | |
Capacity10) (Watts) | 24,960 | 49,920 | 24,960 | 12,480 | 12,480 | |
Power (Watts11)) | N/A12) | 13)11,500 | 14)10,602 | 15)5,900 | 16)5,250 | |
Cooling (Btus17)) | 18)39,240 | 19)36,175 | 20)20,171 | 21)17,913 | ||
Annual Costs22) ($) | 46,091 | 42,930 | 25,864 | 23,506 | 23)using 2009 data | |
$1,000/Tflop | 69.8 | 28.6 | 1.3 | 6.5 | 24)using 2009 data |
All dollar figures based on spreadsheet using March 2009 values
This is what the picture would look like using the 2009 spreadsheet data
What we should look at is teraflops replacement …
And if we double the teraflops…1.6 Tflops (actually + 1 Tflops), 1.5 years ROI for 96 cores.
Actual data obtained April - May, 2013
Kill-A-Watt Meter Stats; pulled one power supply … mean/1000 * 24 * 365 * 30!
Node | jobs | kwh | time hh:mm | mean | comment | annual kwh | power annual | +cooling annual (x2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
c04 | 8 | 2.29 | 06:30 | 352 | idle, no jobs | 92,509 | $21,393 | $42,786 | wow |
c32 | 8 | 6.94 | 19:35 | 356 | jobs finished | 93,556 | $21,610 | $43,220 | |
c27 | 8 | 7.42 | 19:30 | 381 | jobs finished | 100,127 | $22,971 | $45,942 | |
c06 | 8 | 27.46 | 65:11 | 395 | 4 running | 103,806 | $23,734 | $47,468 | |
c00 | 8 | 8.26 | 21:00 | 393 | still running | 103,280 | $23,625 | $47,250 | * |
c03 | 8 | 10.36 | 24:03 | 432 | still running | 113,530 | $25,748 | $51,496 | * |
c04 | 8 | 12.02 | 28:08 | 429 | still running | 112,741 | $25,585 | $51,170 | * |
c09 | 8 | 10.36 | 24:00 | 432 | still running | 113,530 | $25,748 | $51,496 | * |
c10 | 8 | 10.21 | 23:55 | 425 | still running | 111,690 | $25,367 | $50,734 | * |
c17 | 8 | 27.07 | 71:00 | 381 | still running | * | |||
c18 | 8 | 11.23 | 24:41 | 455 | still running | * | |||
c20 | 8 | 50.23 | 143: | 351 | still running | * | |||
c23 | 8 | 8.71 | 24:00 | 363 | still running | * | |||
c25 | 8 | 9.80 | 25:02 | 392 | still running | * | |||
c29 | 8 | 30.22 | 66:22 | 455 | still running | 119,574 | $27,001 | $54,002 | * |
c31 | 8 | 10.30 | 25:10 | 409 | still running | 107,485 | $24,496 | $48,992 | * |
c32 | 8 | 11.42 | 24:00 | 476 | still running | 123,379 | $27,789 | $55,578 | * |
c33 | 8 | 46.23 | 113: | 409 | still running | * | |||
c35 | 8 | 13.69 | 28:53 | 474 | still running | * |
We have measured 19 nodes power consumption (pulling one unit out) with a Kill-A-Watt meter over 775+ hours to arrive at a mean consumption rate of 418.4 watts. That totals to 109,956 KwH/year in power consumption ((watts/1000 Kw per hour) * 24 hours * 365 days * 30 servers), which is a low water mark as the racks in question also contain switches, two UPS units, and a disk array. (Note: Peter did a side calculation using the 4 watt measurement on panel directly and came up with 126,000 KwH/year which can be considered the high water mark estimate).
Based on 12.5 cents per Kwh (this is an all inclusive cost including natural gas cost, heat recoup costs, distribution, maintenance etc) the hardware burns away $13,744.50 per year. Best guess is cooling costs are at least that (another possible low water mark) so the total cost for all power consumption is $27,489 per year. If we run the hardware for another 3 years that total cost is $82,467.
If we could replace, or approximate, the 30 compute nodes' computational power (0.6 teraflops) and job slots (240 cores) with new hardware that consumes 50% less in power, our ROI is 6 years based on the low water mark numbers. When using the high water mark the ROI is 5 years.
For $82K one could get CPU-HPC wise …
vendor | Tnodes | chip | ghz | cache | cores | Tcores | disk | ram | ram/core | Tram | pdu | eswitch | warr | watt | cost | gflops |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dell | 30 | X5355 | 2.66 | 4mb | 8 | 240 | 80gb | 4-16gb | 0.5-2gb | 340 | Y | Y | N | 12,552 | na | 670 |
micro | 14 | 2650v2 | 2.60 | 20mb | 16 | 224 | 1tb | 128gb | 8gb | 1,792gb | Y | Y | 2 | 5,400 | $77K | 4,659 |
advcl | 10 | 2680v2 | 2.80 | 25mb | 20 | 200 | 60gb | 256gb | 12.8gb | 2,560gb | Y | Y | 3 | 4,597 | $84K | 4,480 |
exxct | 12 | 2660v2 | 2.20 | 25mb | 20 | 240 | 1tb | 128gb | 6.4gb | 1,536gb | N | N | ? | 4,860 | $60K | 4,224 |
hp |